One day watching The Adventures of Mark Twain by Will Vinton I started to piece the puzzles of my childhood entertainment, and where it came from. In the world where corporations are merging, going through bankruptcy, being bought out, having assets sold (intellectual rights ) or all of the above or combination. In this case – even though the corporate end is worth knowing – I wanted to know the artist, and people that the legacy has lived beyond the life. After great thought and deliberation I have decided on four (five) individuals (No secrets, look at the title).
There were certain criterion when deciding on the top four (five), and that is placed at the bottom, so you the reader do not get completely bored while waiting for the list.
To the List:
Walt Disney, Jim Henson, Will Vinton, and Aurthur Rankin Jr. & Jules Bass have dominated my childhood cinematic and television existence more than anyone else. These are the producers, directors, thinkers, and tinkers of different worlds with each style is different, the mediums which they tell their stories varies from each other.
Walt Disney: The Patriarch of the Animated Movie
Walt Disney with all his flaws (only human) created some of the most beloved programing that will remain at the top of the mountain. The legacy that he created did not stop on December 15, 1966 when he passed away.
He and his group of imagineers helped prepare me for the future genre of horror. Movies such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Pinocchio, Sleeping Beauty have some of the most terrifying scenes that one could watch (at any age). There are brilliant stories as well as the three listed, but also (my favorites) Robin Hood, and The Sword in the Stone which I would argue are the best two adaptions (adult or children) for their particular parent story (Robin Hood & King Aurthur) in the history of film. Other adaptations that I watched continuous as a child were from book to film were Winnie the Pooh, Marry Poppins, and Bedknobs and Broomsticks. The list can continue form the 90’s to the most recent revival.
Jim Henson: A legacy of the Muppet from Kermit the Frog, Big Bird to Yoda
Jim Henson is another one that his legacy inspired others way passed his passing away. The Muppets were the most awesome creature like beings of television and film for a child, and even today going to the theater with of child at age five or was it four the movie seemed more for me than for him. When Kermit is walking through his mansion he sings “Pictures in My Head,” and watching the still framed pictures of the other Muppets become living 3d hallucinations make me (almost) tear up.
Jim Henson has did not just rely on Kermit the Frog, but also he used Muppets in other ways such as Yoda in two of the three Star Wars movie (the only three worth mentioning). There were films such as the Dark Crystal, and the Labyrinth. Then there were televisions shows such as Fraggle Rock, and The Storyteller.
Will Vinton: Singing Raisins, Dinosaur Christmas, Satan, Adam & Eve, and Mark Twain
Will Vinton is the most obscure and the most alive out the four chosen. He pretty much lurks in the shadows, and unless you par take in a Google search or watch the extras in the The Adventures of Mark Twain most likely you will not know who he is. He is responsible for some of the best motion picture with the use of clay that one could possibly create. He even coined the term “claymation.”
He is the one responsible of the California Raisins, Christmas features that spotlighted dinosaurs, the claymation of Return to OZ, the M&M characters on the commercial (you know the sentient beings that will be eaten), a short version of Rip Van Winkle, and of course The Adventures of Mark Twain. There are other projects as well he worked on.
Vinton was not always the most child friendly production and creation team, but his claymation saturated at least two decades of fun TV shorts, TV movies, and commercials.
Aurthur Rankin Jr. & Jules Bass : Red Nose Reindeer, A Grumpy Santa, Big Bosomed Trees, Hobbits, and of Course B. Franklin
Aurthur Rankin Jr. and Jules Bass has produced or/and directed a good portion of the holiday classic cartoon, and stop motion animation that were born in the 70’s to the 80’s. They have not only gave life to those classic TV movies/shorts, but also gave life to tradition and current mythology. Aurthur Rankin Jr. recently passed away in the beginning of 2014, and according to IMDB he was a “consultant producer” of the latest Thundercats.
Did you notice in the movie, Miracle on 34th Street the 1947 version, that Kris Kingle walks down the street all jovial then notices the store worker is placing the reindeer in the wrong order there were no mention of Rudolph “the most famous” reindeer? Even though there has been references in the past, and even cartoon shorts before Rankin and Bass’s version that was aired in 1967 on NBC solidified Rudolph’s statue in the pantheon of as the “Savior of Christmas”.
They have re-told stories not only of the reindeer, but also colorful and extreme imaginative stories of Santa, Jack Frost, Biblical stories, the Easter Bunny, and Frosty. They were responsible to the best filmed version of the Hobbit (Peter Jackson has nothing), and of course created The Flight of the Dragons (Don McLean helped the soundtrack by performing “The Flight of the Dragons”), and of course The Last Unicorn.
- The introduction had to be at childhood. This means twelve or younger.
- The relationship had to exist well beyond childhood as well in the form of either watching the clips on the internet, purchasing a copy, or/and introduce the article in question to my children.
- Quality and Quantity
- Quality: This can be subjective, and some of these products of art might be despised by others. One (like myself) might love something that majority of the viewers want to tar and feather (Howard the Duck) the production and the people who say “wait a minute.” In this case the quality is based on the (subjective) on going relationship, and the memories as a child. There will not be comparing an adult liking something versus a seven year old.
- Quantity: The creative production has to be ten or more. This can be done by the individual or the legacy that was left behind. Adding distinct piece of works are up the author (me) of this list.
- There has to be one person that has dreamed up the foundation of the legacy.
- Corporations will be involved (this is unavoidable), but there will be some boundaries.
- For Example: Walt Disney will be part of the list (what a surprise) and certain movies production will count and some will not just because Disney bought Marvel Studios or Lucas films does not mean bought subsidiaries will count toward Walt’s legacy. There are films that has been created through Disney the main parent corporation such movies created after his death long into the 70’s through recent times that will count.
- Intellectual property rights do not decide the the creator, but only the owner such in the examples of Marvel. All Marvel by-products would fall under Stan Lee & Jack Kirby.
- I have referenced six producers/creators/directors/writers with the help of IMDB.
- I have reference to comic book artists (one was part of six), and the other was the help of Wikipedia.
- I have referenced one composer with the help of IMDB.
- I have listed 55 to 65 titles depending on how you count.
- I have four images. Each image as manipulate by me.
- Image one and two were from Wikipedia, and manipulated by myself.
- Image three are three separate images as a logo for Will Vinton’s Animation Art Collection, and I have merged them together. The image’s copyright is such © 2013, Vinton Entertainment All Rights Reserved. “Claymation®” is a registered Tradmark of Laika Inc..
- As far as having a works cited for this the majority of information was either discovered on IMDB or Wikipedia.
There are times where I ask my friends on Facebook questions pertaining to entertainment.
In this case, I asked (A younger) Lt. Commander Michael Eddington + Star Wars + Conan the Barbarian =?
How does one answer this question? I will say that if you were a science fiction/fantasy geek whom you might have an easier time and even answer the question right away.
First, if I was the user, I would ask myself what is this geek trying to get at. There is a TV character (that might not be known at the time) and two movies with an equal sign. My intention is that the user will think this would equal to another movie or TV Show in the fantasy/science fiction genre. So, now we know what we are looking for.
Second, if I was the user, I would break down the formula into three concepts.
- (A younger) Lt. Commander Michael Eddington
- Star Wars
- Conan the Barbarian
I would start searching.
The user might search for the concept of “Star Wars,” then they will find information on “Star Wars” and the same goes with “Conan the Barbarian.”
Let us experiment with the key concepts here. We will need to use the Boolean Method of search.
- Three Operators: And, Or, Not
- ” ” = Exact P
There is more to the Boolean, but these are the basics. Users mainly search by using Boolean without knowing.
AND says a user wants to search for all the words. The AND is not required if the user writes Star Wars that would be equivalent to writing Stars AND Wars.
OR says that a user wants to search for either or of the words, but not something that has both items. If the user is just searching the two words Star Wars, and places a OR in the middle making the phrase Star OR Wars.
NOT says that a user wants everything with concept X but not the concept Y. In this case the user would write Star but not Wars, so the user would only get information in the Blue area of the Venn diagram.
By placing quotations over words the user is asking to search that concept as exactly written. For example, “Star Wars.” Every source should have those exact words together and in that order.
What will be the results if the user does a search result such as “Star Wars” and “Conan the Barbarian?”
The user does not get too much as seen on the first five results of Google, nor the other results.
Maybe, we walked through the wrong door when searching. The third concept, (A younger) Lt. Commander Michael Eddington. I would also break this apart too.
- (A Younger)
- Lt. Commander
- Michael Eddington
If I were the user, I would drop A younger and Lt. Commander, and do not search for them. I would add Lt. Commander later if I need to, and also I would use LT Commander to indicate that I am right in my searching results. When I wrote Younger, I was trying to convey to the user to the past.
Notice the Google’s advice from other people searching Michael Eddington. Deep Space 9 and Star Trek appears. I would guess as a user that I am not looking for him on LinkedIn or as an illustration, and design person. The safe bet is picking one of the links pertaining to him as a Star Trek character. Notice the link that I have already looked at that has Lt. Commander. I would go to The Internet Movie Database.
The next question the user would ask. Is the person asking the question alluding for the character Michael Eddington or the actor who plays Michael Eddington?
The Internet Movie Database has that information about the actor, Ken Marshal, who played Michael Eddington on Star Trek.
IMDB lists around twenty-four different acting appearances. There are a few ways to limit the choices. I would subtract any TV Show or movie cameo performances. Hopefully, the user picks up on the fact that the movie or TV Show needs him to be the lead. Second, one can subtract anything that is not in the genres of Science Fiction and Fantasy. Third, the movie or TV show would have to be older than Star Trek: Deep Space 9, because of the key word “younger.”
At this point, one should figure out the answer.