The Obit (uary): Death Sucks, But Information = Good

The obituary is a short blurb (for the most part) memorializing a recent individual that passed away. Depending on the year, and the person’s obituary is most likely never on the day of the death, but a day after to who-knows-when. Remember, the newspaper is not obligated to write every single person’s obituary. The responsibility falls on the loved one of the recently passed.

The majority of the time I find the obituary two or three days after the passing. Once I found an obit four days after the day, and that was because of the end of the year holiday. Another time I looked up the person in the index for obituaries and it was six days after the fact.

One of the obituaries that I found was Dr. James McNaughton. He passed away away June 11th, 1874, and the obituary were published June 29th, 1874. The reason was written within the obituary. Dr. McNaughton passed away in France, and the news paper finally received word. The only reason why they had any form of obituary was the fact he was the second Albany Medical School’s President. An important individual of Albany, NY.

What is not normal is the size of the obituary?

They can range of all sizes. I have seen one or two sentences from one paragraph the example will be on the larger size for an obituary.

Who needs them?

Information is good, and obituaries can pack a lot of information in a short package. People looking for genealogy needs, this is a key source.

  • Dates
  • Living Arrangements
  • Friends and Family
  • The Funeral Ground
  • Institutions

My example will be Nathaniel C. Moak a well respected District Attorney between 1871-173. He was born October 3rd, 1833 and died September 17th, 1892.

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 D

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892

First, notice under the caption September 18th. That is one day after the event.

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 Edited A

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 Edited B

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 Edited C

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 Edited D

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 Edited E

What did we learn about Nathaniel C. Moak?

  • Place and Date of Birth/Death
  • Loved ones (but not their names)
  • Personality and Political Leanings
  • Work History
  • Names of Associates and Friends
  • Past Trials
  • Masonic Information
  • A sketch image.

Nathaniel C. Moak, The Argus Sunday Morning, September 18th, 1892 C

I have scoured the internet looking for images on this guy, Moak, and only found one image. This is another one. Is it only a sketch, but it was something new.

At the end of the day all those items that I listed can help with new leads and potentially lead to a story of Moak’s life.







Wizard of Oz Universe Flow Chart (Update)

Wizard of Oz Flow Chart (Updated)

This flow chart shows connections between the authors & illustrators and the inspirations that have created a universe that is over 100 years old.

This is done in different ways, first there are four different groups that are not only charted by illustrator and/or author, but also chronologically when they were published.

  1. The first forty novels.
  2. The movies produced from 1908 to 1939.
  3. The staged musical and plays from 1902 to 2006.
  4. The very short Disney involvement.

The second way is to show the connection between authors & illustrators (who worked with who). The third way is the highlighting of inspiration. For example Alexander Volkov, a Russian author, translated Wizard of Oz and titled the novel “The Wizard of Emerald City.” He also wrote five other squeals, which spawned over thirty other novels, and they inspired American translations and adaptations.

Through the years there were authors devoted to the writings of Wizard of Oz either creating additions to the Wizard of Oz universe, or by writing non-fiction intellectual works. There were independent publishing companies that came into existence to add to the Wizard of Oz universe, and then there was fan fiction, and self-publishing.

I used fan websites, publishing companies, and fan clubs to determine which stories such as “fan fiction” that should be used. I did not go to the fan fiction websites in search of each story.  I went with the bloggers and independent publishers to determine which stories to use.


Comic Vine
Comic Book DB
March Laumer Website –
The Royal Blog of Oz
Tails of the Cowardly Lion and Friends Publication List
A Wonderful Wiki of Oz
Project Gutenberg
The Royal Timeline of Oz
Oz Project –
The Daily Ozmapolitan
The Wonderful Blog of Oz
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz Website
The Royal Time Line of Oz
And Other Odd & Ends Sites

Debut Time for Straw Hats (1966)

Debut Time for Straw Hats

Debut Time for Straw Hats (1966) from the Knickerbocker and Albany, NY. At the library I was swishing through the microfilm looking for a particular article. This was not the article, although the discussion of straw hats definitely caught my eye.

This tells me some things about May 1966.  First, men used to wear straw hats, and not just the very old men, but a lot of men. Apparently, this has been popular at the earliest from the 1920’s through the late 1960’s. Being that I am only getting this from one article. I am sure the numbers could be expanded on both sides. Second, the weather affected the economy and social behavior involving straw hats. Third, there were at least five different shapes of straw hats, the “boater,” “skimmer”, the “surfer”, the “katy,” and the “mustang.”  Fourth, there were variations of colors. The natural color of the straw was merged with blue, gold, and olive. Fifth, the 1920’s were the “heyday” of the straw hats with the styles like the “boater” and “skimmer.” Sixth, the internet did not cause fluff articles as the internet nay-Sayers would like you to believe.

The orginal article that I was searching for was discovered five minutes later, and emailed to the patron.



Vacation: Family, Books, Thomas Jefferson, & Puzzles

For a few days, the family and I drove up to Lake George swam in the swimming pool at the motel, and at the lake, took an adventure to Ft. Henry William, and did some pirate mini golf.

Thomas Jefferson’s Creme Brulee: How a Founding Father and His Slave James Hemings Introduced French Cuisine to America (2012) by Thomas J. Craughwell

Creme Brulée

I enjoy knowing about the American Revolution, the founders/framers, the political & cultural thoughts/values of that period.

In high school, we are painted the picture of the founders and framers that they were gods, and do no wrong. In college, there were particular professors who would pain a much different picture. The founders and framers were in a complex conspiracy to keep the soon to be freed American citizens subjected not by King George, but by them. There was another professor in the same department, and he did not refer to them as either gods, or as tyrants, but as people.

This particular book is a great companion piece to Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation (2002) by Joseph J. Ellis.  In both works they discuss the greatness and the awe that inspired many, but also the hypocrisy, and the not-so-good, such as with the issue of slavery. In both they refer to the dinner between James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams to create a compromise.  The main part of the meal was macaroni & cheese, which was one of the recipes that James Hemings learned, and perfected. The other popular recipe, pommes de frites, aka skinny french fries.

Action Bible Jigsaw: “David & Goliath”

Action Bible: "David & Goliath" from TDC Games. The image was obtain from TDC Games.

Action Bible: “David & Goliath” from TDC Games.

This was the second puzzle that I have completed during those few days.  I found this at one of those re-sale stores like Big Lots. Hey, why not, better than the floral arrangements, and fifty shades of red.


Rules that Should be Adapted


Back in the late 80’s, 90’s and the year 2000 I was a big WWE(F) fan.  This is part of my influence of the first rule. That gave life to this idea.

The Rule:
The Undertaker Rule

Any movie that has “Tombstone” in the title should have The Undertaker (Mark Calaway) either have a legitimate role, or at the very least a cameo.


The main reason this will help advance westerns by adding something interesting.





J. M. Barrie & Peter Pan a Chart

L. Frank Baum & Peter Pan, which covers Baum's Peter Pan collection, and other works based on that foundation.

L. Frank Baum & Peter Pan, which covers Baum’s Peter Pan collection, and other works based on that foundation. Go ahead and tell me if you think I am missing something, or other needs that may could use revision.


Wizard of OZ Universe Flow Chart (Canon)

A flow chart for the   novels, play (musicals), poems, etc.... for the Wizard of OZ Universe.

A flow chart for the novels, play (musicals), poems, etc…. for the Wizard of OZ Universe.

Are the majority of sitcoms a bunch of “one-liners” strung together with terrible acting?

Are the majority of sitcoms a bunch of “one-liners” strung together with terrible acting?

Or is it just me? I do not watch TV on the TV anymore, well when they are on air for the original time. I got nostalgic the other day, and saw “Melissa & Joey” (2010– ) staring Melissa Joan Hart and Joseph Lawrence on Netflix . The nostalgia was not the actual show, but what they have done in the past such as Blossom (1990-1995) and Clarissa Explains It All (1991–1994) & Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (1996–2003).

There was a bunch of “one-liners” with not so good  acting, actually really terrible. Now, other sitcoms might not be as bad with the acting, but I thought back to others as well, and searched through Netflix, so for most of them, there was the string of “one-liners,” and the acting was average at best. The “one-liners” are blunt, and most of the time not even funny, but more for a quick reaction by the viewer.

I do understand that “Melissa & Joey” (2010– ) is on air at ABC Family, so the quality is not as high as network TV, but I have looked at sitcoms from the networks, and I find that the same type of “one-liners” strung together with the sub-par acting.